An experimental implementation of the contracts that underlay the Dagger storage network. Its goal is to experiment with the rules around the bidding process, the storage contracts, the storage proofs and the host collateral. Neither completeness nor correctness are guaranteed at this moment in time.
To run the tests, execute the following commands:
npm install
npm test
To start a local Ethereum node with the contracts deployed, execute:
npm start
This will create a deployment-localhost.json file containing the addresses of
the deployed contracts.
The Dagger storage network depends on hosts offering storage to clients of the network. The smart contracts in this repository handle interactions between client and host as they negotiate and fulfill a contract to store data for a certain amount of time.
When all goes well, the client and host perform the following steps:
Client Host Storage Contract
| | |
| |
| --------------- request (1) -------------> |
| |
| | ---- offer (2) ----> |
| |
| ------------- select offer (3) ----------> |
| |
| ----- data (4) ---> | |
| |
| ---- start (5) ----> |
| |
| ---- proof (6) ----> |
| |
| ---- proof (6) ----> |
| |
| ---- proof (6) ----> |
| |
| <-- payment (7) ---- |
- Client submits a request for storage, containing the size of the data that it wants to store and the length of time it wants to store it
- Several hosts submit offers containing a price
- The client selects an offer
- The client sends the data it wants to store to the host
- Once the host has received the data it starts the storage contract
- While the storage contract is active, the host proves that it is still storing the data by responding to frequent random challenges
- At the end of the contract the host is paid
A storage contract can be negotiated through requests and offers. A request contains the size of the data and the length of time during which it needs to be stored. It also contains a maximum price that a client is willing to pay and proof requirements such as how often a proof will need to be submitted by the host. A random nonce is included to ensure uniqueness among similar requests. An offer contains a reference to the request it pertains to, a price, and an expiry time.
When a new storage contract is created the client immediately pays the entire price of the contract. The payment is only released to the host upon successful completion of the contract.
To motivate a host to remain honest, it must put up some collateral before it is allowed to participate in storage contracts. The collateral may not be withdrawn as long as a host is participating in an active storage contract.
Should a host be misbehaving, then its collateral may be reduced by a certain percentage (slashed).
A host is required to submit frequent proofs while a contract is active. These proofs ensure with a high probability that the host is still holding on to the data that it was entrusted with.
To ensure that a host is not able to predict and precalculate proofs, these proofs are based on a random challenge. Currently we use ethereum block hashes to determine two things: 1) whether or not a proof is required at this point in time, and 2) the random challenge for the proof. Although a host will not be able to predict the exact times at which a proof is required, the frequency of proofs averages out to a value that was agreed upon by the client and host during the request/offer exchange.
Hosts have a small period of time in which they are expected to submit a proof. When that time has expired without seeing a proof, validators are able to point out the lack of proof. If a host misses too many proofs, it results into a slashing of its collateral.
-
Actual proofs
Because the actual proof of retrievability algorithm hasn't been determined yet we're using a dummy algorithm for now.
-
Contract take-over
Allow another host to take over a contract when the original host missed too many proofs.
-
Start failures
When a contract fails to start it should be aborted after a timeout. A contract may fail to start because the client failed to send the data, or because the host failed to start the contract. To discourage this, a small portion of both the client and host money can be burned if the contract doesn't start within a certain amount of time.
-
Reward validators
A validator that points out missed proofs should be compensated for its vigilance and for the gas costs of invoking the smart contract.
-
Analysis and optimization of gas usage