You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am not a lawyer, so take everything here with a grain of salt.
I was a bit worried when I saw that GitHub doesn't autodetect the OSS license of this project. It does link to the LICENSE file, but only says "see license".
I'd rather like to see:
From what I understand from the legalese at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0, I think you're not doing anything wrong, technically, by showing only the short text. But I, for one, would feel better if GitHub just automatically said the project is Apache 2.0, like it does for many other OSS projects.
I am not a lawyer, so take everything here with a grain of salt.
I was a bit worried when I saw that GitHub doesn't autodetect the OSS license of this project. It does link to the LICENSE file, but only says "see license".
I'd rather like to see:
From what I understand from the legalese at https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0, I think you're not doing anything wrong, technically, by showing only the short text. But I, for one, would feel better if GitHub just automatically said the project is Apache 2.0, like it does for many other OSS projects.
See https://github.com/moby/moby/blob/master/LICENSE for an example how to include the full license.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: