Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Need better representation of relative size than biggerThan and smallerThan #70

Open
gabbard opened this issue Sep 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Need better representation of relative size than biggerThan and smallerThan #70

gabbard opened this issue Sep 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
priority-1-normal size-medium
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@gabbard
Copy link

gabbard commented Sep 4, 2019

Since of course size can vary along a number of dimensions (e.g. by length? by volume? what if something is longer in one dimension but not another?)
This was referenced Sep 6, 2019
Closed
Closed
@gabbard
Copy link
Author

gabbard commented Sep 17, 2019

Not for M3.

@lichtefeld
Copy link
Collaborator

It's worth noting that for Axes we introduced MuchBiggerThan and MuchSmallerThan which we could also apply to the relationships between objects if we can justify the relationship. It might be reasonable to assert that a house is MuchBiggerThan a ball for example in normal cases.

@lichtefeld lichtefeld mentioned this issue May 27, 2020
Closed
@boyleconnor boyleconnor mentioned this issue Oct 18, 2022
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
priority-1-normal size-medium
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gabbard @lichtefeld