You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 31, 2021. It is now read-only.
This pep allows you to sum up dicts. It's exactly like creating new dict and executing update() on it. Probably, this pep will be rejected because sum for dicts isn't symmetric. Is it appropriate PEP for pepallow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As i said in #11 . It is better to avoiding mutation of builtin functions / types. We tried to mutate None in PEP336 implementation and it doesnt look cool.
I am thinking about a branching Allow operations. For PEPs like 313, it is better to use AST but for peps like 584 we can use a runtime mutation strategy backed by ctypes
Some of drafts quite promising. For example, PEP-584:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0584/
This pep allows you to sum up dicts. It's exactly like creating new dict and executing update() on it. Probably, this pep will be rejected because sum for dicts isn't symmetric. Is it appropriate PEP for pepallow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: