Issue with README.md statement

[mykeels]

Awesome repo!

However, this statement about the close-knit-nature of Routes to Controllers appears to be false: "It's a new way of thinking about the way applications should be crafted!"

I suggest it's looked into.

[isocroft]

Good observation @mykeels

How do you mean ? Can you elucidate further ?

[shalvah]

I think he means that the statement isn't correct, because traditionally MVC routes made use of the controller/action paradigm, so saying this is new is misleading. See also https://www.codeproject.com/tips/573454/routing-in-mvc

[mykeels]

Yea @shalvah. I'm sorry, @isocroft ... I couldn't reply earlier.

I know for a fact that ASP.NET MVC makes use of the ~/controller/action/{id} route by default, which makes that assertion wrong.

I think it should be modified ...

[isocroft]

i read this: https://www.codeproject.com/tips/573454/routing-in-mvc

I will effect the change in the README.md file soonest. Funny, I'm not an ASP.NET Dev. So i didn't think it had it already.

Thank a lot @mykeels and @shalvah for bringing this to my attention to this.

[isocroft]

@mykeels and @shalvah check out the changes to the README.md file. Just to make sure everything is alright.

[isocroft]

Okay, i think it's safe to say i have dealt well enough with this one. 💯