Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduce Log Level #1787

Open
2 tasks
markostreich opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks

Reduce Log Level #1787

markostreich opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@markostreich
Copy link
Contributor

markostreich commented Jun 20, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

As a tester and administrator of DigiWF, I want to have a pleasant user experience by increasing the clarity of error messages. One way to achieve this goal is by reducing log levels to the necessary minimum. Currently, logs that are not very helpful are being written at millisecond intervals, which hides relevant information.

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Analyze which logging can be reduced.
  • Consider which logging is necessary for data protection reasons. It must be logged which user accesses the system.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Acceptance Criteria

  • Log level recommendations are available for the DigiWF components, including recommendations for classes and/or packages that require alternative log levels.
  • The log levels are adjusted in the property files and/or in the source code.

Additional context

@markostreich markostreich self-assigned this Jun 20, 2024
@markostreich markostreich removed their assignment Jun 20, 2024
@markostreich markostreich changed the title Reduce Log Level to Improve Performance Reduce Log Level Jun 20, 2024
@markostreich
Copy link
Contributor Author

Das bitte in digiwf-s3-integration-client-example mit korrigieren:

logging:
  level:
    io:
      muenchendigital: info

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant