-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bottleneck: Large loads #110
Comments
@NicholasFry Thank you for the detailed description. I'll work on this over the weekend and get back to you on what I find out. |
@NicholasFry The large amount of time to perform the search in your script is not due to the loads, it is due to the value of
I've added user information that will be printed to the console if the maximum number of boreholes in the domain exceeds 2500 in PR #111. Direct feedback from the tool on design tips like this are something The |
I understand. That makes sense. Thank you for looking into this. |
Describe the bug
There seems to be a significant increase in runtimes for large loads. (400-700 tons) I assume this is a bottleneck, but I recall running similarly large loads in v0.1 with relative ease. I am including a load profile to test. The Atlanta building example still runs fine. (~700-900 seconds for this)
Perhaps this is normal, given the restrictive nature of the constraints.
To Reproduce
ghedt
:ghedt-v0.3
https://github.com/NicholasFry/Other/blob/main/place.py
Error message
Please provide either a screen shot of the error message or copy and paste in the message below:
Additional context
demand_place.csv
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: