Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need for a tool to quickly test site configs #119

Closed
techexo opened this issue Sep 5, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

Need for a tool to quickly test site configs #119

techexo opened this issue Sep 5, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@techexo
Copy link
Contributor

techexo commented Sep 5, 2017

Hello,

I do not know where to put that, because it concerns graby, graby-site-config and wallabag.
I was wondering if there was a way to have a small "standalone" version of graby that would read the config files without caching anything and return the content.

Basically, I am trying to help fivefilters (and thus graby-site-config) writing new config files, but doing it with wallabag running on a not-so-powerful server is really painful. Each time I make a change in the configuration files, I have to clear wallabag's cache, which is quite long (between 1-2 minutes on a Cubietruck!) ; delete the article and submit it again to wallabag. The whole process can take a few minutes, even when the issue was just a missed comma :( .

Unfortunately, I am hopeless coding anything in PHP... The ideal would be a php file without cache reading on-the-fly just one config file (or a specified config file) and that, given an URL, would display the content without any stylesheet (thus showing very quickly what are titles, paragraphs and so on).

Thanks in advance, and do not hesitate to ask further details if needed.

Regards

@j0k3r
Copy link
Owner

j0k3r commented Sep 6, 2017

You mean, that https://f43.me/feed/test ?

@techexo
Copy link
Contributor Author

techexo commented Sep 6, 2017

Yes, exactly what I meant! Couldn't find it because... hem...

Thanks!

@techexo techexo closed this as completed Sep 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants