Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The package should be versioned #18

Closed
jackfirth-mj opened this issue Jul 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Closed

The package should be versioned #18

jackfirth-mj opened this issue Jul 5, 2015 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jackfirth-mj
Copy link
Contributor

The version format should be equivalent to the last two portions of semantic versioning - per Racket package guidelines, major versions (which are allowed to be backwards incompatible) should be new packages. Backwards incompatibility should be allowed before committing to a 1.0 version.

@jackfirth jackfirth added this to the 1.0 milestone Jul 6, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants