ignore the assert statement's conditional branch. (#1378)

[morganga]

assert statement coverage should be considered complete if the assert statement was visited. There's no need to track multiple branches at the assert statement.

This is in agreement with the previously reported issue #324, which suggested "They should not be treated as code instructions."

I've extended the ignored instructions to include the assert statement check. This will make coverage complete with or without assertions enabled.

[morganga]

before fix:

after fix:

[morganga]

An alternative solution to AssertFilter: 62

output.ignore(start, ((JumpInsnNode) cursor).label);

results in this report, where they're not even considered coverage lines:

[ice1000]

I love that

[Cybermite]

Going to bump this and see if we can get it looked at and merged?

This has been the main reason why our team hasn't migrated off of clover.