New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify partial state save/restore traversal requirements #1028
Comments
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented http://java.net/projects/javaserverfaces-spec-public/lists/jsr344-experts/archive/2011-08/message/0 At this point it looks like we should specify that tree visiting should be used for these traversals, as this allows components (eg. Trinidad's UIXCollection) to intercept the traversal in order to perform component-specific processing. |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented SECTION: Modified FilesM jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/Application.java
M jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/StateManager.java
M jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/view/StateManagementStrategy.java
M jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/context/FacesContext.java
Committed to trunk: Sending jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/Application.java |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented {save,restore} View(). http://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1028 SECTION: Modified FilesM jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/Application.java
M jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/StateManager.java
M jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/StateManagerWrapper.java
M jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/context/PartialResponseWriter.java
Committed to trunk: Sending jsf-api/src/main/java/javax/faces/application/Application.java |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
@glassfishrobot Commented |
|
Mojarra and MyFaces differ in how they implement the partial state save/restore traversals. Mojarra uses tree visiting. MyFaces does not. The spec should define requirements for this area to ensure consistency across implementations.
Affected Versions
[2.1]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: