Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What to say about BCP47 Support? #1225

Closed
eclipse-faces-bot opened this issue Oct 2, 2013 · 9 comments
Closed

What to say about BCP47 Support? #1225

eclipse-faces-bot opened this issue Oct 2, 2013 · 9 comments

Comments

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link

BCP47 defines new rules for the parsing of Locale objects. These rules are implemented in the java.util.Locale class in JDK7. There are several places in the JSF spec that place requirements on how a Locale is encoded as a String.

  • XSD for supported-locale

  • XSD for default-locale

  • Spec section "2.5.2.1 Determining the Active Locale" in the portion of that section that deals with the locale attribute on the <f:view> tag.

In all of these places statements are made regarding the use of "-" or "_" as a separator. This issue asks if we should go further and require the use of JDK7 Locale.forLanguageTag() to obtain the Locale instance before trying the existing methods of obtaining a Locale.

Affected Versions

[2.2]

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Reported by @edburns

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Issue-Links:
is duplicated by
JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1210
is related to
JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1245

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
Set priority to baseline ahead of JSF 2.3 triage. Priorities will be assigned accurately after this exercise.

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@manfredriem said:
Setting priority to Critical

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@manfredriem said:
Applied to 2.3 trunk,

svn commit -m "Fixes https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1225, What to say about BCP47 Support?"
Sending spec/frame/requestProcessingLifecycle.fm
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1172.

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@manfredriem said:
Applied to 2.3 trunk,

git commit -m Fixes https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1225, What to say about BCP47 Support?

Commit Log
revision : cfea96318ea1b8de2615e7a450860fa7b017ae86
author : Manfred Riem manfred.riem@oracle.com
date : Sep 17, 2015 8:25:59 AM
summary : Fixes https://java.net/jira/browse/JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1225, What to say about BCP47 Support?

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Marked as fixed on Thursday, September 17th 2015, 6:27:18 am

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
This issue was imported from java.net JIRA JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1225

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@eclipse-faces-bot eclipse-faces-bot added this to the 2.3 milestone Aug 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant