Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let CDI handle #{facesContext} EL resolving #1311

Closed
eclipse-faces-bot opened this issue Sep 16, 2014 · 7 comments
Closed

Let CDI handle #{facesContext} EL resolving #1311

eclipse-faces-bot opened this issue Sep 16, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link

Let CDI handle #{facesContext} EL resolving

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Reported by @manfredriem

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@manfredriem said:
The following changes were added to the spec:

ADDED - As part of a continued effort of aligning the JSF specification with the CDI specification the EL resolver added by the CDI runtime will play a more important role in doing EL resolving. As such the following table states which JSF artifacts will be resolved by means of CDI producers:

JSF Artifact Backing JSF methods
FacesContext FacesContext.getCurrentInstance()

REMOVED - the references to the FacesContext EL resolving in the implicit EL resolver area

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@manfredriem said:
The changes have been reverted because we are going to open an issue that better describes it from a high level. It will show what the expected changes for this issue are going to be and related issues.

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Marked as fixed on Tuesday, October 14th 2014, 8:57:40 am

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
This issue was imported from java.net JIRA JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-1311

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant