Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compatibility certification request for EE4J implementation of Jakarta Transactions #50

Closed
10 tasks done
tomjenkinson opened this issue Jul 31, 2019 · 12 comments
Closed
10 tasks done

Comments

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor

tomjenkinson commented Jul 31, 2019

> java -version
java version "1.8.0_202"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_202-b08)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.202-b08, mixed mode)
  • Summary of the information for the certification environment, operating system, cloud, ...\
> uname -a
Linux default-java-mbwkj 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Jun 14 02:54:29 EDT 2019 x86_64 Linux
> cat /etc/os-release
NAME="Alpine Linux"
ID=alpine
VERSION_ID=3.8.1
PRETTY_NAME="Alpine Linux v3.8"
HOME_URL="http://alpinelinux.org"
BUG_REPORT_URL="http://bugs.alpinelinux.org"
  • By checking this box I acknowledge that the Organization I represent accepts the terms of the EFTL.
  • By checking this box I attest that all TCK requirements have been met, including any compatibility rules.
@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tomjenkinson tomjenkinson changed the title Compatibility certification request for EE4J implementation of Jakarta Mail Compatibility certification request for EE4J implementation of Jakarta Transactions Aug 1, 2019
@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually, I think it is just the TCK results that needs moving

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

So it is just Public URL of TCK Results Summary that needs updating when the linked PR is merged I think

@bshannon
Copy link

bshannon commented Aug 9, 2019

I updated the SHA-256 above to match the latest TCK. Please be sure to run that TCK.
Also, the TCK results summary link should be to the final page, not the pull request
creating that page, and the results page needs to include a copy of the certification request.

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bshannon just re-ran TCK with https://jenkins.eclipse.org/jta/job/TCK_run_pipeline/50/consoleFull and used 76b80f10347804a38d5f12ea09a74356f8ea26298e97c8a525d7a9e3379f1fc5

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just updated the job to archive this... https://jenkins.eclipse.org/jta/job/TCK_run_pipeline/51/artifact/environment.txt

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

tomjenkinson commented Aug 15, 2019

Raised a PR for the certification page with the details asked for: eclipse-ee4j/glassfish#22819

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jgallimore - might I ask if you would be available to review this certification request, please? The information to complete the review should be included in https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-spec-project-leads/msg00224.html

@edbratt
Copy link
Contributor

edbratt commented Aug 23, 2019

+1
Looks good to me

@kwsutter
Copy link

kwsutter commented Sep 2, 2019

@tomjenkinson Could you please update the TCK link on this CR and the TCK-Results page to show the official location of the TCK? https://download.eclipse.org/jakartaee/transactions/1.3/?d. Thanks!

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @kwsutter - I have raised https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/pull/22831and updated the description of this PR

@tomjenkinson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I added the accepted label and closed the issue as it has been 14 days now so going for "lazy consensus" https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/blob/master/process.adoc#certification-resolution

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants