-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define Exceeding Maximum Expiration Date Policy #11
Comments
I am going to leave this topic open for further discussion on the various registry policies associated with exceeding the maximum expiration date. I really only see two possible options:
Maybe we can add the <registry:exceedMaxExDate> element under the registry:domain element after the <registry:period> element, with the description: Zero or more <registry:exceedMaxExDate> elements that defines the action taken by the server when executing commands that will result in an expiration date that exceeds the maximum expiration date. The required "command" attribute is used to define the command with a renewal feature, such as "renew" or "transfer". New commands can be defined that include a renewal feature, such as "sync". The possible values for the <registry:exceedMaxExDate> element include:
|
Added the <registry:exceedMaxExDate> element under the <registry:domain> element to support returning the server policy when the client exceeds the maximum expiration date on a per renewal command basis, based on feedback from Patrick Mevzek. |
Patrick Mevzek comment on the REGEXT mailing list (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/T33Zp_4pmwd94K_QuEDA6cPHK7Y):
Jim Gould reply to comment on the REGEXT mailing list:
We need additional information related to the possible set of policies from the registries. Right now the only policy discussed on the list is clipping fractional days beyond the maximum expiration date, but exceeded the maximum expiration by a full unit (year or month) will result in an error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: