We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi @jamesroberts!
I've run fastwsgi against some of the bjoern test cases that have accumulated over the years. From a very quick check, here are my results:
tests/empty.py
tests/env.py
tests/headers.py
tests/huge.py
tests/hello.py
tests/keep-alive-behaviour.py
tests/not-callable.py
tests/test_exc_info_reference.py
I've used this file to substitute the bjoern module in the tests:
bjoern
# bjoern.py from fastwsgi import run
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is great! Thanks for this! I definitely need to do a lot more tests for edge cases and handle error cases. This will help a lot.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The changes over the past year have solved all the listed bugs. Thanks for providing some great test cases! FastWSGI 0.0.8 should be much more stable.
No branches or pull requests
Hi @jamesroberts!
I've run fastwsgi against some of the bjoern test cases that have accumulated over the years. From a very quick check, here are my results:
tests/empty.py
segfaulttests/env.py
segfaulttests/headers.py
memory leaktests/huge.py
hangs forevertests/hello.py
hangs forevertests/keep-alive-behaviour.py
segfaulttests/not-callable.py
segfaulttests/test_exc_info_reference.py
memory leakI've used this file to substitute the
bjoern
module in the tests:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: