Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FieldError: Page doesn't have level in Django 1.8.7 and Django CMS 3.4 #10

Closed
snejy opened this issue Dec 22, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

Comments

@snejy
Copy link

snejy commented Dec 22, 2015

Just after adding the plugin occured FieldError.. Cannot resolve keyword 'level' into field. Choices are: application_namespace, application_urls..

@dmodules
Copy link

dmodules commented Jan 7, 2016

Did you find solution for this? I think this plugin does not work with django cms 3.

@snejy
Copy link
Author

snejy commented Jan 7, 2016

It should be okay with django-cms==3.1 because it still works with mptt.. For fix the template and cms_plugins should be reworked but I dont think there is a tree_info templatetag equivalent in treebeard for now.

@dmodules
Copy link

dmodules commented Jan 7, 2016

Do you still have this bug?

@jasjukaitis
Copy link
Owner

For CMS 3.2, I've planned a new plugin from scratch but unfortunately had no time to do this.

@snejy
Copy link
Author

snejy commented Jan 13, 2016

I've found djangocms-htmlsitemap which works with CMS above 3.2 but lacks some of the filters like created_by etc. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/djangocms-htmlsitemap/

@dmodules
Copy link

Thank you! :)

Martin

@jedie
Copy link
Contributor

jedie commented Jun 28, 2016

Get the same error "Cannot resolve keyword 'level' into field." with 'master' and CMS 3.3 :(

Is this project alive?!?

Better use: https://github.com/kapt-labs/djangocms-htmlsitemap ?!?

@jedie jedie mentioned this issue Jun 28, 2016
@jasjukaitis
Copy link
Owner

I've abandoned this project. As @jedie linked, please use djangocms-htmlsitemap now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants