Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(open || closed) world assumption #15

Closed
elf-pavlik opened this issue Sep 12, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

(open || closed) world assumption #15

elf-pavlik opened this issue Sep 12, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member

Paragraph bellow gives me impression of possibly taking closed world assumption. I may interpret it completely different then intended by author, so I would like to clarify which assumption this spec follows.

When serialized, absent properties are represented by either (a) setting the property value to null, or (b) by omitting the property declaration altogether at the option of the publisher; these representations are semantically equivalent. If a property has an array value, the absence of any items in that array must be represented by omitting the property entirely or by setting the value to null.

-- http://jasnell.github.io/w3c-socialwg-activitystreams/activitystreams2.html#syntaxconventions

@jasnell
Copy link
Collaborator

jasnell commented Sep 30, 2014

Not seeing a specific technical issue here.

@jasnell jasnell closed this as completed Sep 30, 2014
@elf-pavlik
Copy link
Member Author

I confused use of JSON null with something in lines of vcard:None

JSON-LD spec also has short paragraph about usage of JSON null, which looks similar to the one here http://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld/#dfn-null

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants