License Confusion

[NeonMonk]

Bit confused about the license you've chosen to publish this under.

Is it Apache License, as the attached license file, or is it MIT as the bower.json file claims?

[jasonzissman]

Excellent catch. I understand the MIT license to be more permissive, so I will lean towards that. I'll put out a pull request to change the license to MIT. In the meantime - do you have any opinion on which license type would be more useful for you?

[jasonzissman]

PR #25 created.

[NeonMonk]

Thank you for your quick response :)

MIT license is of course always preferred as the more permissive license. Personally in my case they're both perfectly fine.

Noting the simplistic differences:

https://tldrlegal.com/license/apache-license-2.0-(apache-2.0)
https://tldrlegal.com/license/mit-license

MIT is marginally simpler for libraries.