Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature request]: Allow Mixed models to only estimate the random effects. #2780

Closed
qymera0 opened this issue Jun 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@qymera0
Copy link

qymera0 commented Jun 13, 2024

Description

It would be interesting if we could specify a mixed model with only random effects. In Engineering and Industrial Statistics, this is a very common case, where you want to just estimate a process variance, but no systematic effect is present.

Purpose

Increase the flexibility of different model structures.

Use-case

No response

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No

Is your feature request related to a JASP module?

No response

Describe the solution you would like

Allow specify the models like this: y ~ 1 + (1 | z)

Describe alternatives that you have considered

I tried to manually change the formula at R console, but when I hit ctrl + enter, it gives me an error.

Additional context

This case can be complementary of the feature request I did related to add nested random terms.

@qymera0 qymera0 changed the title Allow Mixed models to only estimate the random effects. [Feature request]: Allow Mixed models to only estimate the random effects. Jun 13, 2024
@tomtomme tomtomme assigned FBartos and unassigned EJWagenmakers Jun 13, 2024
@FBartos
Copy link

FBartos commented Jun 14, 2024

Hi, this feature was recently added, and it will be in the upcoming release! 🎊

@FBartos FBartos closed this as completed Jun 14, 2024
@qymera0
Copy link
Author

qymera0 commented Jun 14, 2024

Thank you so much! Your software is really fantastic!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants