New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ignore Exceptions, but log them #92
Comments
Isn't it possible to combine |
I think I got it working by (mis-)using |
No that's not an optimal solution. But couldn't you use |
But I cannot get the Exception information in the Listener, can I? |
Not atm, but perhaps it would be a good idea to add this? Would that solve your problem? |
Yes, that would be a good solution! |
@johanhaleby What do you think about this issue today (after more than two years)? If you think this is still a good a idea/meaningful feature, then I can probably tackle this. What solution would you prefer? Should I introduce a new method in the |
@grofoli That would be really helpful! |
@johanhaleby I hope you like the PR. |
Years later, but ... I really appreciate this API change (and the rest of the project!) -- thanks! |
I have a few situations where I don't want certain exceptions to interrupt my wait, but for debugging purposes it's quite valuable to have the information that this exception occured. Therefore it would be nice to be able to register a ExceptionListener (or extend the ConditionEvaluationListener) to handle those exceptions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: