Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

are these typos #7

Closed
HansHammel opened this issue Mar 7, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

are these typos #7

HansHammel opened this issue Mar 7, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@HansHammel
Copy link

insert_nade
update_nade
link_nade
merge_nade
remove_nade

nade!?

@jclevy
Copy link
Owner

jclevy commented Mar 8, 2017

Yes, these are typos. Hope I'll come back soon on that.

@jclevy jclevy closed this as completed Mar 8, 2017
@HansHammel
Copy link
Author

You are very consistent with your typing errors 😜

@jclevy
Copy link
Owner

jclevy commented Mar 13, 2017

At least, something I'm still good at! 😅
BTW are you using ChocolateJS?

@HansHammel
Copy link
Author

HansHammel commented Mar 14, 2017

Nope, I am working on a similar project and chocolatejs has plenty of the stuff I would want for the first release of my "real full stack" framework. I was just spying on your code. Maybe we can collaborate. You are not coincidental at the CeBit in Hanover or at JSUnconf in Hamburg? BTW: I hate coffee script, it's just one more meta-language with rare support in terms of tooling, ides, etc. Does coffeescript make use of cutting edge ECMAScript features!? My whole approach is quite similar, like there are mandatory things developers need to be more productive e.g. an ide/api to save things back to disk (without chromes workspace) esp. for inplace style-editing, markdown support (as a filebased cms, as well as for documentation purpose), jasmine tests on a per view/page/component base (my clou is, each component gets its jasmine tests attatched to the end of the page, that works well on desktops and mobiles, you can edit your current components view and run the tests each time something changes, on mobiles you will get a audio feedback so you don't have to scoll down to see the failing tests), a selfhosted multi-tenant PKI suitable even for mobile. proxy and loadbalancing stuff. But I try to go further including thinds like configuration management, fault tolerance, provisioning and auto-scaling, codestyle-checking, security-tools, an automated/intelligent component-transformation/transpilation-capability (hard to explain in short words), service discovery, centralized loggin (muteable by file), autotranslation, usermanagement, etc. and many more. Its a raw concept at the moment. Lots of the stuff is working (testing, component, routing, autotranslation in a few dozend languages) but ugly coded or very unstable (like the nginx, mongodb, redis shutdown procedure). I am reworking it for a reduced, stable release. I am leveraging a lot of existing projects, and so I am interested in yours. Regards, Oliver.

first sneak preview ever 😉:
sh4
sh1
sh2
sh3
sh5
sh6

tested on windows, ubuntu, android (app and browser) and fireos (app)

@jclevy
Copy link
Owner

jclevy commented Mar 17, 2017

Waou! So many services to integrate. I have the same kind of goal in ChocolateJS but not as absolutely complete. Unfortunately I won't be at CeBit nor at JSUnconf but I would glad to follow your project. I know many developers hate Coffescript but I do like this language. I chose Coffeescript at a time I was developing a lot of code in python and javascript and I wanted to have only one language to use client-side and server-side. Coffeescript inspired some of the new es6 features and I like the fact that it forces me to do some kind of pair programing alone by comparing the intent I put in the coffeescript code with the transpiled javascript it produces (I do that in the Lab panel of my online ide). Good luck with your project and keep me informed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants