New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License? #8
Comments
Jason, Could you please help me out? What kind of licence would be the most liberal? Many thanks, Johan Coppieters, Brugge. Sent from my iPad.
|
Depends on what you mean by liberal. But if you mean the most permissive then generally of the common open source licenses the MIT and BSD licenses would be your most likely choices. They both boil down to essentially "you can do whatever you want with this code" with some basic protections for you and your copyright. MIT License Comparison of common OSS licenses You may also be interested in checking out GitHub's article on open source licensing. |
I also suggest MIT. It's a very "liberal" license and people commonly like adopting software under it. |
OK, thanks guys! |
Is Cody available under a particular open source license? I have been looking for information about this on both your website and this GitHub repository but have been unable to find licensing information.
The above from your website homepage is the closest I could find as a sort of custom license, however that simply isn't good enough for my purposes. If Cody is already licensed under a particular open source license you may want to make it more obvious (such as adding it to the README.md and/or adding a license file in the root project directory) otherwise you may want to look into the common open source licenses and consider using one of them. Unfortunately a small blurb appearing solely on your website rather than in the project repository and therefore which could simply disappear at any time isn't going to be good enough for my purposes so I am forced to pass on Cody for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: