Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix Codacy Issue: Use explicit scoping instead of the default package private level: #192

Closed
tsvetaevAlex opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Fix Codacy Issue: Use explicit scoping instead of the default package private level: #192

tsvetaevAlex opened this issue Feb 25, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@tsvetaevAlex
Labels
aber to reuse bord item aber to reuse duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
JDI Dark Board

Comments

@tsvetaevAlex
Copy link
Contributor

tsvetaevAlex commented Feb 25, 2020 •
edited

board item able to reuse
duplicate of task: 26
Use explicit scoping instead of the default package private level
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex created this issue from a note in JDI Dark Board (To do) Feb 25, 2020
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex added the CodacyWarning CodacyWarning label Feb 25, 2020
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex self-assigned this Feb 25, 2020
@ElenaPoduzova ElenaPoduzova mentioned this issue Feb 25, 2020
Closed
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex added aber to reuse bord item aber to reuse duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed CodacyWarning CodacyWarning labels Feb 25, 2020
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex removed this from To do in JDI Dark Board Feb 25, 2020
@BelAn97 BelAn97 closed this as completed May 13, 2020
@BelAn97 BelAn97 added this to Done in JDI Dark Board May 13, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex

Labels
aber to reuse bord item aber to reuse duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
JDI Dark Board
  
Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@BelAn97 @tsvetaevAlex