New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
mise en
#1655
Comments
Also strongly suggesting it should be |
I think this would be fairly easy to implement if anyone wants to have at it, I think we can just call |
I like the idea. When using it from Xcode project scripts it'd just be one line of code. I'd check if it works fine with I'm not Xcode developers will entirely understand what the command is for, but the copy and pasting that they'll most likely do has more chances to work. Have you considered |
well, we already have a command |
Naming is hard 😬. I'd expect |
I had an idea reading rvm's documentation and its similar (but not the same as what I'm proposing here) as their
rvm in
command.We already have support for
rvm in
withmise -C some/dir x
but I have been thinking lately that people would probably benefit from a convenient way to performmise x -- $SHELL
—which gives you a nice way to launch into the mise environment without needing to usemise activate
in your shell rc file—notably the way I like to use mise. I think in places like IDEs it can often be a lot easier to set things up this way as well.I'm thinking
mise en
could be a nice shorthand for that, so you could just domise en .
and it would be effectively like doingcd .
but it'll setup all of your tools and everything.Of course this doesn't enable anything new since you can just run
mise -C some/dir x -- $SHELL
and it does the same thing (perhaps via amise_en
alias), but having a top-level command is a good way to teach people how best to use mise and I think this is a pattern a lot of people would benefit from knowing about.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: