Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Version Update #494

Closed
sebastianzillessen opened this issue Jul 14, 2016 · 7 comments · Fixed by #544
Closed

Version Update #494

sebastianzillessen opened this issue Jul 14, 2016 · 7 comments · Fixed by #544

Comments

@sebastianzillessen
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

the latest version published was 1.1.5.

Since then some useful features have been submitted to the project. Are you planning on releasing a new version soon?

Cheers,

Sebastian

@marienfressinaud
Copy link

Hi,

The latest version of Teaspoon is 2 years old, and we are facing the very annoying #443 (comment) issue on several of our projects, fixed by #529 which is in master but still not released in any official version.

Do you plan a new release soon? How can we help you to make it happen?

Thanks!

@pablobm
Copy link
Contributor

pablobm commented Dec 21, 2018

@jejacks0n - Following up on your comment at #537 (comment) (re: your not having much time lately), would it make sense if new people were allowed to merge PRs and publish new releases? I feel that some of us would be able to lend a hand.

@trcarden
Copy link

trcarden commented Apr 7, 2019

Others are also interested in getting a new gem version cut:

@jbosse
Copy link

jbosse commented May 9, 2019

The published gem is really old yet the repo seems very active lately. Some sort of update to the top of the README as to what the release plan is would be really helpful.

We have two major issues (headlessness and removing coffee script) forcing us to remove teaspoon but it looks like they have already been resolved in master.

@jejacks0n
Copy link
Owner

I'm trying to get things merged in and released. Would welcome any help getting existing PRs shored up and passing on CI.

@jejacks0n
Copy link
Owner

@pablobm -- I have CI passing, so that might make things easier?

@pablobm
Copy link
Contributor

pablobm commented Jun 14, 2019

@jejacks0n - Sorry, what do you mean? Reviewing existing PRs? Cutting new gem versions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants