Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RTC-350] Enable VAD extension for WebRTC peer #80

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Sep 13, 2023
Merged

[RTC-350] Enable VAD extension for WebRTC peer #80

merged 3 commits into from Sep 13, 2023

Conversation

Karolk99
Copy link
Contributor

@Karolk99 Karolk99 commented Sep 5, 2023

No description provided.

@Karolk99 Karolk99 requested a review from LVala September 5, 2023 08:42
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #80 (61a69d3) into main (c92ab84) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #80   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.71%   83.71%           
=======================================
  Files          41       41           
  Lines         706      706           
=======================================
  Hits          591      591           
  Misses        115      115           
Files Changed Coverage Δ
lib/jellyfish/peer/webrtc.ex 48.27% <100.00%> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c92ab84...61a69d3. Read the comment docs.

@mickel8 mickel8 changed the title Enable VAD extension for WebRTC peer [RTC-350] Enable VAD extension for WebRTC peer Sep 13, 2023
@mickel8 mickel8 merged commit 2b0f5f1 into main Sep 13, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
@mickel8 mickel8 deleted the vad branch September 13, 2023 15:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants