Few questions #45
Unanswered
JaineshPathak
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Yes, to reduce CDN cost, PAD would definitly be a good option, just know that there are limitations to it in terms of max size and number of bundles (see the PAD documentation).
Sorry that most of the answers are "try it out", but each usecase is different, and I haven't had a need to use PAD since I made this package, so my own usage of this is limited to the basics. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am working in a small team and currently using Addressables 1.8.5 in Unity 2019.3.15f1.
Currently we are using Google Cloud Storage as CDN and we are finding it costly. As a result, we think using PAD is a good option.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions