You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now, batch operations like batchGet do not provide type inference, and simply resolve to any. Will this be supported in the future, or is there an underlying technical reason as to why this is not the case?
My team relies on batch operations extensively in our scheduled workloads, and not having type safety for these operations is a big reason why we haven't migrated to DynamoDB Toolbox yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now, batch operations like
batchGet
do not provide type inference, and simply resolve toany
. Will this be supported in the future, or is there an underlying technical reason as to why this is not the case?My team relies on batch operations extensively in our scheduled workloads, and not having type safety for these operations is a big reason why we haven't migrated to DynamoDB Toolbox yet.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: