Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ECS] indirect packs should use the internal cache #94

Closed
Tracked by #62
JessyDL opened this issue Jan 14, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #95
Closed
Tracked by #62

[ECS] indirect packs should use the internal cache #94

JessyDL opened this issue Jan 14, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #95
Milestone

Comments

@JessyDL
Copy link
Owner

JessyDL commented Jan 14, 2023

The way the packs are handled internally in the ecs state results in some copying; as the indirect packs are managing their own memory (the indices only), this results in some overhead for copying. If we make the indirect packs as lightweight as the direct packs (by using the state's internal cache), then we can remove quite a bit from this overhead.

@JessyDL JessyDL added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Jan 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant