-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Oil refining inputs: non-energy-use-capture-component #365
Comments
The input-output coefficients and carbon densities of each fuel in the generic oil refining technology can be interpreted as follows: |
Thanks for the feedback, @pkyle . This all makes sense, I didn't think to account for the energy output in that equation. One follow-up: I've added a new tech, "oil refining CCS," and have been attempting to require a share of oil refining output in a region to come from CCS tech, either by a RES or subsidy like I do with other sectors & techs. The model is having particular difficulty solving. It doesn't appear simply economic, as I tried keeping the non-energy input cost on par with standard oil refining as a test and had the same result. I've been sure to turn global & regional shareweights on where appropriate. In earlier years with RES/subsidy policies requiring smaller amounts of CCS, "carbon-storage" markets often fail (esp in Japan, Middle East) and the policies fail with supply ~= 0. In later years with higher shares of CCS required, many markets fail, economy-wide. Do you have any ideas as to what I might be missing here? (example input XML attached as .txt) Thank you again for your feedback. |
If the CO2 price of some region/time period is zero then by default the cost of any technology that captures CO2 will be very high. It's from this block of code:
Where |
That explains it; thanks for all your help. Happy holidays! |
Good afternoon team,
I've been thinking through CCS implementation in the GCAM oil refining subsector. In order to determine the capture rate, I was considering the energy inputs (GJ input per GJ refined liquids): electricity (0.005), gas (0.02), and oil (1.06). Given oil's input/output ratio is much higher than the other two, I guessed that part of the input is used as the feedstock being refined.
If this is the case, I guessed that I would see a non-energy-use-capture-component applied to denote a share of the carbon content not being emitted as CO2, but don't see this tag in the refining XML. Could you advise if I'm making a mistake here / if the primary oil being refined is not actually captured by that energy input / some other reason? Thanks so much for your input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: