-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 535
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
LaTeX output: more complete version #98
Comments
The LaTeX output is like the HTML and man output -- it's a It would also be helpful to document which LaTeX packages You might also check out my project jgm/lcmark, which uses +++ Romain Bazile [Jan 18 16 05:22 ]:
|
I do agree this is probably better than trying to find a one size fits all thing that probably won't work. |
+++ Romain Bazile [Jan 18 16 09:31 ]:
Nothing else I can think of. Note that the main |
So maybe I should include modifications to those too, to be consistent and complete? |
Yes, it may be that some of these things belong in the man pages rather than the README.md (or in addition -- though I'd like to avoid having the same content in multiple places). Note that the cmark.3 man page is generated automatically from comments in cmark.h, so you shouldn't modify it manually in the repository. |
I was wondering if the LaTeX output should include the necessary header for the file to compile directly with LaTeX interpretor.
Right now, there is now
\begindocument
and more importantly, the necessary\includepackage
are not documented anywhere.I think cmark LaTeX output would benefit from either of the two solutions:
Or both!
Is there anyone working on the subject? Maybe I can try to tacle it!
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: