Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PDF table rows scrunched together #271

Closed
candlerb opened this issue Jul 9, 2011 · 1 comment
Closed

PDF table rows scrunched together #271

candlerb opened this issue Jul 9, 2011 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@candlerb
Copy link

candlerb commented Jul 9, 2011

When outputting a table where the rows wrap onto multiple lines, I find that the spacing between adjacent table rows is much smaller than the spacing between the text lines within one row, which gives very confusing layout.

This is using pandoc 1.8.1.1 (from cabal-install), Ubuntu 11.04, and the version of texlive it bundles (2009-11)

Example markdown source:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiplier  Priority  Description  Notes
            Value
----------  -------   -----------  -------------------------------------------
0           0         Core Node    The core switches/routers will not be
                                   participating in STP... reserved in
                                   case they ever are

1           4096      Redundant    Ditto
                      Core Nodes

2           8192      Reserved

3           12288     **Building
                      Backbone**

4           16384     **Redundant
                      Building
                      Backbones**

5           20480     Secondary    This is for building complexes, where
                      Backbone     there are separate building (secondary)
                                   backbones that terminate at the complex
                                   backbone.

6           24576     **Access     This is the normal edge-device priority
                      Switches**

7           28672     Access       Used for access switches that are
                      Switches     daisy-changed from another access switch.
                                   We're using this terminology instead of
                                   "aggregation switch" because it's hard to
                                   define when a switch stops being an
                                   access switch and becomes an
                                   aggregation switch.

8           32768     Default      No managed network devices should have
                                   this priority.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table: Priority Table

For rendered output see http://psg.com/~brian/pandoc-table-sample.pdf

@jgm
Copy link
Owner

jgm commented Jul 10, 2011

I think the solution is for pandoc to use the ctable package for tables, instead of the built-in tabular environment. Looking into it.

@ghost ghost assigned jgm Jul 10, 2011
@jgm jgm closed this as completed in 09479ba Jul 10, 2011
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants