You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I know that Pandoc supported inline footnotes several years before MMD, and Fletcher chose a format incompatible with Pandoc when he could have used the same formatting:
Neverthless, would it still not be better to have an mmd_inline_footnote extension to turn convert between Pandoc's ^[inline footnote] and MMD's [^inline footnote] for greater conversion compatibility?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the meanwhile I used a personal short script in ickc/markdown-variants/inline_notes-mmd-to-pandoc.sh as a preprocessor to convert the style from mmd's to pandoc's or vice versa. But I would love to see a native support.
Edit: since the preprocessor is not a parser, a native support would be much better. For example, the preprocessor won't know a text is in Verbatim (code) blocks.
For the meanwhile I used a personal short script in ickc/markdown-variants/inline_notes-mmd-to-pandoc.sh as a preprocessor to convert the style from mmd's to pandoc's or vice versa. But I would love to see a native support.
I get an error 404 when I try to follow this link. Might you, or anyone else, have a script or extension that helps with this issue? (I'm not optimstic that I will figure it out by myself.) Thank you.
I know that Pandoc supported inline footnotes several years before MMD, and Fletcher chose a format incompatible with Pandoc when he could have used the same formatting:
#2053 (comment)
Neverthless, would it still not be better to have an
mmd_inline_footnote
extension to turn convert between Pandoc's ^[inline footnote] and MMD's [^inline footnote] for greater conversion compatibility?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: