Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Look out for a more robust testing framework #39

Closed
jgonggrijp opened this issue Jan 22, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Look out for a more robust testing framework #39

jgonggrijp opened this issue Jan 22, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@jgonggrijp
Copy link
Owner

I'm not a great fan of cram. It works, but it forces us to write workarounds (see #37). If you can think of a better solution, please let me know.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2017

py.test seems to be the bandwagon these days. In addition, some people (not me personally) like to wrap it with tox.

@jgonggrijp
Copy link
Owner Author

I love py.test, but it is meant for unit tests. I think it is a good idea to add unit tests (with py.test), but those do not replace wholesale functional tests, which is what cram currently provides.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 6, 2017

PyInstaller has extensive functional testing all based on py.test.

@jgonggrijp
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks, I'll study that.

@jgonggrijp
Copy link
Owner Author

Closing this as I consider it an archived discussion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant