You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of version 0.3.0, the Bayesian D-efficient designs are generated via the idefix package. However, as was raised in #10, idefix has some limitations. In particular, the idefix::Modfed() function is quite slow, and it is the only option available if using a restricted set of profiles.
So with that in mind, I'm posting this issue to discuss potential alternatives. I'm not necessarily looking to replace idefix, but perhaps supplement cbc_design() with even more options for generating D-efficient designs.
This summary of related packages was recently published. After a quick look, there appear to be quite a few possible alternatives that could be incorporated into `cbc_design():
support.CEs: Looks pretty simple, but it doesn't look like it supports Bayesian designs with priors. The author has a book too with a lot of other examples.
skpr: Looks promising but isn't clear if it's made for choice experiments.
ExpertChoice: Clearly made for choice experiments, not clear if priors can be included.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
v0.4.0 of the package now has a new method argument for supporting new design methods. It now supports full factorial, orthogonal, and Bayesian D-efficient designs.
As of version 0.3.0, the Bayesian D-efficient designs are generated via the idefix package. However, as was raised in #10, idefix has some limitations. In particular, the
idefix::Modfed()
function is quite slow, and it is the only option available if using a restricted set of profiles.So with that in mind, I'm posting this issue to discuss potential alternatives. I'm not necessarily looking to replace idefix, but perhaps supplement
cbc_design()
with even more options for generating D-efficient designs.This summary of related packages was recently published. After a quick look, there appear to be quite a few possible alternatives that could be incorporated into `cbc_design():
support.CEs
: Looks pretty simple, but it doesn't look like it supports Bayesian designs with priors. The author has a book too with a lot of other examples.skpr
: Looks promising but isn't clear if it's made for choice experiments.ExpertChoice
: Clearly made for choice experiments, not clear if priors can be included.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: