False-positive in unnecessary_lambda_linter?

[strengejacke]

I got a warning from lintr:

Warning: file=R/check_predictions.R,line=434,col=30,[unnecessary_lambda_linter] Pass exp directly as a symbol to lapply() instead of wrapping it in an unnecessary anonymous function. For example, prefer lapply(DF, sum) to lapply(DF, function(x) sum(x)).

The related code line is:

sims[] <- lapply(sims, function(i) exp(i) - plus_minus)

This looks like a false-positive to me?

[MichaelChirico]

Thanks for the report! Seems the fix for #2231 was not robust enough.

[strengejacke]

Thanks for fixing this so quickly!