Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: skip checking base class when providing jtype #55

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Conversation

mapleeit
Copy link
Member

@mapleeit mapleeit commented Oct 18, 2022

If the user has already defined jtype in config.yaml, there is no need to guess the class name.

Resolves: https://github.com/jina-ai/hubble/issues/640

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #55 (6b6830f) into main (9bd75f4) will decrease coverage by 2.00%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #55      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.35%   82.35%   -2.01%     
==========================================
  Files           9        5       -4     
  Lines         537      153     -384     
==========================================
- Hits          453      126     -327     
+ Misses         84       27      -57     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
normalizer/helper.py
generator/core.py
generator/models.py
generator/__init__.py

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@mapleeit mapleeit marked this pull request as ready for review October 18, 2022 02:38
Copy link
Member

@nomagick nomagick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

@mapleeit mapleeit changed the title test: use other base class name fix: skip checking base class when providing jtype Oct 18, 2022
@mapleeit mapleeit merged commit d25cca6 into main Oct 18, 2022
@mapleeit mapleeit deleted the inspect-executors branch October 18, 2022 03:07
@nan-wang
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.9.2 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants