Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for revision 0.7 of XEP-0215 #5786

Closed
weiss opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

Support for revision 0.7 of XEP-0215 #5786

weiss opened this issue Apr 8, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels
feature-request Issue which suggest an idea, enhancement or feature to implement

Comments

@weiss
Copy link

weiss commented Apr 8, 2020

Jitsi Meet (optionally) uses XEP-0215 to discover STUN/TURN services. Version 0.7 of the XEP bumped the namespace to urn:xmpp:extdisco:2 in 2015, it would be nice if Jitsi Meet could use that instead of extdisco:1. Presumably, you could just use extdisco:2 in place of extdisco:1 and ignore the new attributes returned by the server.

Prosody's mod_turncredentials supports the new namespace for some months now; and I'm currently adding XEP-0215 support to ejabberd and would be happy not having to support the old one 😄

@damencho
Copy link
Member

damencho commented Apr 8, 2020

Actually we use a slightly modified version of the module that supports multiple turn hosts as response.
But we can port the changes.

@Neustradamus
Copy link

@damencho: Yes it is important to have the up-to-date module with your changes.
Maybe your changes can be integrated in the original module...

@licaon-kter
Copy link
Contributor

Any news on this?

ejabberd 20.04 with support was released already: https://www.process-one.net/blog/ejabberd-20-04/

And more servers are getting STUN/TURN support day by day: https://compliance.conversations.im/test/turn/

But at least 42% of them (https://nitter.net/iNPUTmice/status/1257543944486785030) can't enable the use of TURN for Jitsi Meet since this is a Prosody (custom module) only thing :(

@Echolon Echolon added the feature-request Issue which suggest an idea, enhancement or feature to implement label May 25, 2020
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Aug 23, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Aug 23, 2020
@Neustradamus
Copy link

Always here.

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix Issue won't be fixed label Aug 23, 2020
@weiss
Copy link
Author

weiss commented Jan 27, 2021

Seems this has been implemented, many thanks!

@weiss weiss closed this as completed Jan 27, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request Issue which suggest an idea, enhancement or feature to implement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants