You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In addition to what is shown on the map have a automated function to write a report that includes more information on what is observed by blueforces.
(This would only be from blue forces that are defined as recon forces.. So , only some units would produce the intelligence report.
For example, if a unit (set to invisible in DCS mission editor, to simulate a concealed observation post) see movement along a road. Then the map would populate the observation as with all other blue units (ex MBT Platoon), for 4 MBTs). But the report would also include what time the observation was conducted, what the speed was, which direction it was heading, also the report would include the excat amount of units reported. (With other units, if they see 3 MBT's moving, then the rule would show it as a platoon (containing 4 MBT's).
Also, maybe other information could be added.
All intel reports, should have the option for a ANALYST comment (which would be a mission designer that could add an assessment) or even someone else could get the role to make an assessment to what is happening.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Very good idea! I believe this would be best handled by the server application. The idea is for all "information filtering" to happen on the server in order to ease the client load (pluss.. in MP it would prevent haxxxxing)
Add a function to create intelligence reports.
In addition to what is shown on the map have a automated function to write a report that includes more information on what is observed by blueforces.
(This would only be from blue forces that are defined as recon forces.. So , only some units would produce the intelligence report.
For example, if a unit (set to invisible in DCS mission editor, to simulate a concealed observation post) see movement along a road. Then the map would populate the observation as with all other blue units (ex MBT Platoon), for 4 MBTs). But the report would also include what time the observation was conducted, what the speed was, which direction it was heading, also the report would include the excat amount of units reported. (With other units, if they see 3 MBT's moving, then the rule would show it as a platoon (containing 4 MBT's).
Also, maybe other information could be added.
All intel reports, should have the option for a ANALYST comment (which would be a mission designer that could add an assessment) or even someone else could get the role to make an assessment to what is happening.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: