Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discussion regarding performance / absurd #6

Closed
linegel opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Discussion regarding performance / absurd #6

linegel opened this issue Aug 12, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@linegel
Copy link

linegel commented Aug 12, 2021

Since this implementation consistently beats IndexedDB implementation AND provides a consistent syntax for SQLite operation (e.g. you may use same-way defined operations like in an electron app) isn't that implementation is actually absurd?

Good use cases seem pretty clear to me
In case there some another, a well-maintained project for the same purpose, maybe it would be good to add a link to that repo in the description?

@linegel linegel changed the title Discussion regarding performance Discussion regarding performance / absurd Aug 12, 2021
@jlongster
Copy link
Owner

The code itself is not absurd, but the fact that it's needed at all and that we're stuck with something like IndexedDB is, and the fact that it beats it so handedly. Don't read too much in the name :)

There's only one other project that I know of that's attempted a similar thing, but it's not quite as fleshed out and proven yet, and doesn't have as much optimizations: https://github.com/rhashimoto/wa-sqlite

@linegel
Copy link
Author

linegel commented Aug 29, 2021

@jlongster I opened this issue just to have some fun but after reading README and running perf tests on my own I realized that there in no jokes happening in this repo, that's something that people could actually use in a real production environment to improve how their apps work. So please, just consider choosing another name for repo just to prevent misunderstanding of people about the goal of your project.

And thanks for all that stuff you did!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants