-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move to pytest-dev organization #590
Comments
I also offer domain If you do not care for it I will continue to maintain it and point it to the right location for a few years at least. |
Unfortunately, it turned out that pyfakefs seems not really to fit into Sorry about that - I really thought that this would work... |
I think it was a good idea to propose it. If the other organizations do not care for pyfakefs, that is their prerogative. |
Closing this for now. |
Reopen as the move is now approved. Some things to do:
|
Just to make sure we are on the same page, the first step would be to transfer the ownership of the repository to one of the pytest-dev core maintainers (I volunteer). |
Transfer to @nicoddemus requested. |
Thanks folks! Move has been completed, invite sent to @jmcgeheeiv to join the pytest-dev organization. 👍 |
I plan to make a 5.0 release soon, where the automatic release will be tested. Hopefully not forgetting anything for that... |
In case you want a template, you can take a look at: https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-mock/blob/main/.github/workflows/deploy.yml You need to create a EDIT: nvm, just noticed you opened a PR already. |
|
So... thanks everyone - move complete! |
As discussed with @jmcgeheeiv, it would be a good idea to transfer this repo to the pytest-dev organization. This would help to ensure continued maintenance, and also possibly to get more eyes for issues and code reviews (given enough eyeballs...).
While pyfakefs is not only a pytest plugin, as it can also be used with other test frameworks, pytest-dev seems like a good match, as the majority of new pyfakefs users seem to use it via the
fs
fixture, and improving pytest support is a sensible goal for pyfakefs.We seem to meet most of the preconditions, except the name (nothing we can do about this, changing it now would not be a good idea), and the authors info, which can easily be added.
The first step will be to clarify if pyfakefs is feasible for pytest-dev - I will write a respective mail in the pytest-dev list, and we can go on from there of we get a go.
cc @nicoddemus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: