New reporter "info" #28
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The info reporter is more colorful, less indented than spec, shows each "describe" with a begin/end pair (which is useful for large lists of "it"s). In contrast to spec it does not show skipped tests.
|
Closing as #29 contains the same changes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We switched from Google Test to Bandit and none of the reporters was "nice" enough. Coming from reporter "spec", a new reporter "info" is more colorful, less indented, and shows some begin/end information for describes which is useful to follow large lists of "it"s. Also skipped tests are not shown.
The output is also good to use for test code that produces output. Here is an uncolored example:
PS: I also want to change the summary at the end. But I think a pull request now is also fine.