Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

follow-up on "Proper way to perform many pair-wise comparisons?" #1

Open
mikerobeson opened this issue Apr 22, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@mikerobeson
Copy link

Moved this thread (joey711/phyloseq#330) here as requested.

@mikerobeson mikerobeson changed the title Waste Not, Want Not... Proper way to perform many pair-wise comparisons? Ignore Apr 23, 2014
@mikerobeson mikerobeson reopened this Apr 23, 2014
@joey711
Copy link
Owner

joey711 commented Apr 23, 2014

Is there a topic?

@mikerobeson mikerobeson changed the title Ignore follow-up on "Proper way to perform many pair-wise comparisons?" Apr 23, 2014
@mikerobeson
Copy link
Author

Yep, we are concerned about those multiple-multiple comparisons too. We are just doing some simple data exploration at the moment. But, as mentioned before, depending on how I carry-out these pair-wise comparisons via phyloseq (linked in the previous thread post above) I get quite different results. I am trying to get a handle on how those different approaches (i.e. procedure 1 vs procedure 2.) affect the interpretation of the results. And which of the two is the generally (technically) preferred way to perform pair-wise comparisons. Any insights?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants