-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 561
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Error Message type "caffe.SolverParameter" has no field named "name". #88
Comments
Hi, so FYI the unit tests run fine on the last version. Now, there are two errors reported in your log excerpt:
In summary, these are very uncommon errors, if you cannot figure the origin out, post your API calls in full, and list the content of your model repository, and possibly give number of classes in your dataset, etc... |
This is really weird, because what I'm doing is launching several services and training them, one after the other, via a python script. |
The first error I believe clearly indicates that somehow the server is getting a model Now, dd reads a model repository and automatically decides which file is what (solver or model). So I'd say either your script does something with the model files, either you are trying to train multiple models from the same model repository, thus mixing up files somehow, either files are named in a way that confuses detection by dd... Listing your model repository right after your second training call fails should help debug this. Make sure there's no automatic |
OK, from our other exchanges, this is due to the model path that confuses the detection of files by dd. I'll fix that shortly with a more narrow check on Caffe model file naming scheme for dd. In the meantime, remove any occurence of |
Hi,
I'm getting the following error when launching a training service in a server.
I've got the same configuration in a VM which I was using for testing a script and it works perfectly well.
I think the only difference is that the server has the latest dede and the has a version that's from sunday.
I may be missing something, but can't figure it out, because I've got the same ubuntu, fully patched, same folder structure, same commands from the script, etc...
Could this be cause by the new version?
Thanks,
Isaac
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: