Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Minor deployment regression: in the tarball the files should be stored in a directory #6

Closed
jonelo opened this issue Mar 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Minor deployment regression: in the tarball the files should be stored in a directory #6

jonelo opened this issue Mar 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jonelo
Labels
bug Something isn't working solved Solved

Comments

@jonelo
Copy link
Owner

jonelo commented Mar 10, 2024

The 2.5.0 tarball stores all files in the tarball's root, this is not correct, it should store the files in the folder called jacksum-file-browser-integration. Documentation is correct, the tarball is not. This is a minor deployment regression since the 2.4.0 tarball is correct.
@jonelo jonelo added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 10, 2024
@jonelo jonelo self-assigned this Mar 10, 2024
@jonelo
Copy link
Owner Author

jonelo commented Apr 3, 2024

Fixed in 2.6.0

@jonelo jonelo closed this as completed Apr 3, 2024
@jonelo jonelo added the solved Solved label Apr 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jonelo jonelo

Labels
bug Something isn't working solved Solved
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jonelo