Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Manual login requiring an @ in the login name #22

Open
zl1fly opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Manual login requiring an @ in the login name #22

zl1fly opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@zl1fly
Copy link

zl1fly commented May 17, 2023

My e-mail login with my provider is not the same as the e-mail address and does not contain an @ in so I am unable to use this to log in. Is it possible to remove the requirement for an @ in the login username for providers that issue a separate login rather than using an e-mail address?

@tiger3110
Copy link

I have the same issue. Provider is 1blu.de

@bishoy-magdy
Copy link
Collaborator

It's uncommon for me to see an email address without an @ sign. Then what will you enter in the email field, username or mailbox, as mentioned in the 1blu.de IMAP config?
Anyway, I will remove the email checker from the email input field in the next version.

@tiger3110
Copy link

It isn't an E-Mail address. There is a seperae login username, that is not represented by the corresponding e-mail-address. So thanks for removing the "@"-sign checker

@isigmund
Copy link

same issue here as well, I am selfhosting my email server on a Synology NAS, also here the username to login into imap is not the email address, but rather the name of the user on the NAS.

@oloryn
Copy link

oloryn commented Feb 17, 2024

Same issue here, running Postfix on one of my servers. The field being labelled 'Email Address' should really be labelled 'Login Username', and shouldn't require an @.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants