Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[REQUEST] Consider using MikroORM #4

Open
tukusejssirs opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

[REQUEST] Consider using MikroORM #4

tukusejssirs opened this issue Nov 20, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tukusejssirs
Copy link

I don鈥檛 want to start any war, but you might want to either replace TypeORM with MikroORM or at least add a support of MikroORM. 馃槈
@josephgoksu josephgoksu added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 1, 2022
@josephgoksu
Copy link
Owner

It seems pretty cool. I'll check and add to the backlog. Thanks for the recommendation.

@tukusejssirs
Copy link
Author

I also recommend Fastify (using @nestjs/platform-fastify) instead of Express. 馃槈

@josephgoksu josephgoksu changed the title Consider using MikroORM [REQUEST] Consider using MikroORM Feb 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tukusejssirs @josephgoksu