-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dissuade <meta name="generator"....> #91
Comments
@dandart could you please elaborate? |
I've seen generator around before, mainly on old frontpage-related sites. I thought it ought to be featured since it exists, but dissuaded since it's not a standard and/or doesn't add anything. |
The W3C lists it as a possibility, and no top-ranking websites speak against it. That said, it's very close to useless. |
Got this added. Thanks @dandart! |
I think one reason, to not recommend meta-generator is security related. Imagine someone running a website based on an old Typo3 or Wordpress Version.
You wouldn't do that, would you? Conclusion: |
@tomlutzenberger I generally agree with you. However, generator is actively used by WordPress today, and Hide the Version of WordPress to Improve Security, or NOT?. Also, it is an HTML5 standardized metadata name. I think @vonrac nailed it with:
|
All that said, that tag makes me cringe a little when I see it 😬 |
Me too. I just don't see any benefit using it. |
Until a top-ranking site speaks against, I think I should leave it where it is. I try to roll with the general web development consensus as much as possible. And there doesn't seem to be a strong consensus either way on this one. Sorry homie I know this one bothers you. Just pretend it isn't there 😆 Or talk someone prominent into writing about why it shouldn't be used. |
Alright, I see your point. calls Sundar Pichai ☎️ 😆 |
I have seen <meta name="generator"...> used before, is it not an anti-recommendation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: