Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 4, 2018. It is now read-only.

uv__fs_event_rearm return codes are ignored #1078

Closed
joshwilsdon opened this issue Jan 16, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

uv__fs_event_rearm return codes are ignored #1078

joshwilsdon opened this issue Jan 16, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@joshwilsdon
Copy link
Member

I ran into a problem where fs.watch would pretend to be watching a file when the port_associate call was actually returning ENOENT. The reason appears to be:

uv__fs_event_rearm(handle); /* FIXME(bnoordhuis) Check return code. */

is not checking the return value from uv__fs_event_rearm() even though that should have returned the errno from the failed port_associate().

@indutny
Copy link
Contributor

indutny commented Jan 20, 2014

May I ask you to give a try to #1082 ?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants